We all know that we live in a crazy mixed up world.
Some take it seriously and live by every word that is spoken. Some don’t care
at all, and the opinion of others, is not something to live by. Others use a
common sense approach, based on facts, as well as the opinions of others as
long as they are backed by facts that can be proven. Others seek spiritual
knowledge of enlightenment of one following or another. Well this blog-er, does
seek spiritual knowledge from God. I acknowledge Him as my Lord and Creator. I
believed He loved this world so much and His creation that He knew before Adam
and Eve were created that He was going to have to have a plan of salvation. But
this is not all about Christ and what He has done for me lately. But I also
consider myself a conservative. I believe in capitalism, in sarcasm, and having
a good laugh.
So as this is the first blog entry of this blog, I
feel the need to talk about this: silly season. Yes, silly season is upon us
again. Now, before any of you start asking what silly season is, let me define
what I am calling silly season. Silly Season is termed by NASCAR in which
basically drivers who are in the last year of their contract start talking to
other organizations or the organization they currently drive for in getting a new
contract or contract extension. Normally this starts in the second half of the
season, but not uncommon after the first few races into the current season.
Silly season also deals with sponsorship changing too. But I am not referring
to NASCAR. I am going to refer to something else: POLITICS.
I know it is a nasty word, and one that we can’t
seem to do anything about. Silly season is me referring to this year 2014 being
an election year more on the state level, with a few federal races going on.
See, silly season in politics starts, I don’t know, let us say a year and a half
before the election. See here in Wisconsin, the race for governor is in full
swing, with just less than a month away from the actual election. But I am not
going to sway you the reader into who you should vote. But I am going to bring
up something that I think should be happening, which I believe is more common
sense than anything else: proving who you are who you say you are, otherwise
known as the now defunct Voter ID Law, in which on Monday October, 6, 2014 the
federal appellate circuit court of appeals stated that Wisconsin’s Voter ID Law
is constitutional and can be enforced, only in the fastest turn around I have
ever seen in the judicial process, be overturned by the Supreme Court of the
United States. This was turned down by a vote of 6-3. The bench is 5-4
Republican to Democrat. What this tells me is that two Republicans have decided
that they needed to be moderate.
But why was this turned down? What is the problem
with identifying yourself when you go and vote? I was involved earlier today
with some friends from my early childhood days. Some of the things that were
brought up were that you need an ID for is: alcohol purchase, tobacco purchase,
car purchase, gun purchase, and in the military you are given an ID to help
identify you when you are in civilian clothes on any military base. You even
need to identify yourself when you enter into another country and back into our
great nation. So why not voting? One of my friends stated that he pulled a fast
one on a person at the poll by giving his neighbor’s name instead of his own. The
person was just about to cross off that name when he stopped them. Here is just
one instance in which an ID requirement would have been useful. I myself, the
last few times I have gone to the polls, have presented my ID to make sure it
is me that is voting in my place and I am not voting in somebody else’s place
or somebody else in mine. In the information technology world, there are ways
of identifying yourself when you log on to your home computer, in the case of
having multiple users, or at work when logging on to the company’s network.
These can become more stringent in the use of biometric enhancements (retina
scanning, facial recognition, finger scan, thumb scan, or hand scan). But yet
we are told that in Wisconsin, you don’t need an ID to vote, but you need one
to get human services help, like food stamps. Heck you need to be able to prove
who you are when you get hired for work by a company. Why is voting have to be
different? This law isn’t about protecting Republicans, but Democrats as well.
It is a way of keeping balance without risking security.
Texas was included in last night’s decision and
their law was turned down too. Texas plans on upholding their law despite the
decision of the Supreme Court. This is according to conservativetribune.com in
a post on Facebook just on October 10, 2014. Now, I don’t know if Wisconsin
could be able to do this, but in Texas you go big or you just don’t go. Why?
Because according to Texas, everything is bigger in Texas. And that must mean
kahunas as well.
So what is going to happen? Well we will go on
living day to day, until the cases in up in the hundreds where people haven’t
been able to vote only because somebody else has voted in their place, or a
serious amount of dead people have suddenly risen from the grave to appear at
the polls, to cast their votes only to go back to sleep for two more years. So
what is the cost of an ID, very little to free, a trip to the DMV and maybe an
hour of your time spent there. But we won’t talk about the DMV. We will save
that for another time.
Since I posted this. The Supreme Court of the United States has reverse their decision in regards to Texas, stating the Texas is able to enforce a Voter ID law.
ReplyDelete